Shock and horror, she looks exactly the same! Or potentially even more like a zombie stripper than she did before. Before I sarcastically mock TMoms, I just want to say that I understand having a specific look that you wear every day that becomes a part of your persona. On a much, much more restrained scale, I like to do my cat-eye gel liner every day because 1. I think it works for my eye shape and 2. I have a very hourglassy body type that looks best in '50s style dresses, so I like to do a little '50s style makeup. So I understand where you're coming from, TMoms. I just think you've taken it a lil too far.
We get it. You were all cute in How the Grinch Stole Christmas but now you want to be all grown-up and badass and rebellious. Fine. Totally deserved. But does having hair that looks like it was ripped off the head of a life sized mermaid Barbie doll and then made into a wig used by an extra in Flash Dance really accomplish that? Or does it say "I am legitimately insane and these mangy extensions are eating into my brain?" As for picture #2, I'm sorry, but thigh-high pleather boots, a bra, and a button-down are not an outfit unless you are Julia Roberts in Pretty Woman. TMoms, I'm sorry, but you are no Julia Roberts.
It gets even better. Why not pair a cheap, Victoria's Secret bustier with a crucifix, thigh-highs, and some sort of odd leg harness? Perhaps because it makes you look like a futuristic brothel girl who has a Single White Female fixation on Madonna? Just perhaps. Also, the "I f*** for Satan shirt?" Really? We get it. You're super badass. This is just tasteless. Which one of your parents saw you wear this before you left the house and went, "yes. I am okay with my daughter wearing this because she looks like a classy young lady with stand-up moral values." Also, leather granny panties? Where do you even buy those???
You know what would be super rebellious for her at this point? Taking out the extensions, scraping off the eyeliner, and doing a simple, clean Jason Wu-esque outfit, not even super girly but just something uncomplicated and fresh. Now that would be truly shocking.
Images via gofugyourself.com.
Showing posts with label ewww. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ewww. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Evil: Aka Finals
Hey girls,
I will be out of commission for the next two days due to a severe case of finals. Boo. But I will (if I'm still alive) be back full force Thursday night. Wootwoot.
In the mean time, please enjoy this little piece of adorable:
Image from dailysquee.com.
I will be out of commission for the next two days due to a severe case of finals. Boo. But I will (if I'm still alive) be back full force Thursday night. Wootwoot.
In the mean time, please enjoy this little piece of adorable:
That's the face I'm making right now. >.<
Image from dailysquee.com.
Friday, November 19, 2010
Fashion Contraceptive
I don't even know what to say about these pants. Except that they could possibly function as birth control and the act of paying $900 for these should be illegal.
Ellery Bloodstone Extra Wide Flare Pants, $900 at shopbop.com:
Just...why? WHY? I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU, FASHION.
Image from shopbop.com.
Ellery Bloodstone Extra Wide Flare Pants, $900 at shopbop.com:
Just...why? WHY? I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU, FASHION.
Image from shopbop.com.
Monday, November 15, 2010
Daily Dose of Ugly
Sometimes fashion baffles me. Don't get me wrong, most of the time I love it, but this...this makes me question it.
Georgie Ashley Lace Bell Bottom Pants, $218 at shopbop.com: More than $200 for polyester lace printed bell bottoms. No. No. No. Just no. NOOOOO. So ugly my retinas are burning.
Image from shopbop.com.
Georgie Ashley Lace Bell Bottom Pants, $218 at shopbop.com: More than $200 for polyester lace printed bell bottoms. No. No. No. Just no. NOOOOO. So ugly my retinas are burning.
Image from shopbop.com.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
I Just Don't Understand
I'll totally admit, I've spent over $200 on a pair of jeans, over $600 on a bag, over $400 on a necklace, all my own money. And I do firmly believe that some things are worth spending a little more on. A $150 pair of jeans has a lot more engineering that's meant to flatter you than a $40 pair of jeans. But even I draw the line somewhere. There's a place where a price tag just becomes ridiculous and unjustifiable. So today I thought I'd do a little case study on when a price tag makes sense, and when it doesn't.
Bottega Veneta Belted Slouched Leather Pants, $4,500 at net-a-porter.com, Balmain Buttoned Low-rise Flared Jeans, $2,490 at net-a-porter.com: I don't think that anyone should buy MC Hammer pants ever, really. And leather MC Hammer pants? No way. But leather MC Hammer/harem pants that cost over FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS. That's not even bad anyone, it's just funny. I want to know who the market is for this. Who is buying these? There is no way that they're worth the price. How much engineering goes into a pair of harem pants? Um, not much. The same goes for these jeans. Oooh, they're Balmain. Are the buttons silver? No. Are there diamonds woven into the cotton? No. It's just a pair of cotton jeans with a bit of stretch and way too many buttons and zippers. Don't get me wrong, the cut is really flattering, but 7 For All Mankind makes a pair of jeans with that exact cut for less than $200, and it probably fits just as well. Sometimes you really are paying for the name instead of the actual product. Sometimes that's okay, as with really iconic pieces--a Chanel 2.55, a pair of Louboutins. But a pair of jeans? Nope.
Lanvin Ostrich Feather-Trimmed Georgette Gown, $6,720 at net-a-porter.com, Valentino One-Shoulder Silk Gown, $6,990 at net-a-porter.com: When a multi-thousand price tag is worth it to me (in the imaginary world where I have that money to spend), is when the materials used are really high quality and the construction involved is flawless. Look at these two gowns. It's just a coincidence that it's the battle of pants vs. dresses here, by the way. The Valentino dress is almost worth it because of the immpecable quality of the cut and the draping. That looks like a $7,000 dress. The price tag isn't surprising. It's modern, it's timeless, it's impossibly flattering, and chic and yet sexy. You could wear it over and over again without it being dated. The Lanvin gown gets some of the cost from all those ostrich feathers. I feel like Lanvin is one of the brands that justifies it's prices really well. Lanvin pieces are always well constructed, perfectly thought out, polished, and fun. Just look at this gown! It screams red carpet. The materials are so luxurious, the '20s inspired cut will never be dated, and the white is such a versatile color--it could even be a wedding dress.
I know this is a really random post, but I saw those pairs of pants today on Net-A-Porter and literally almost had a mental breakdown, especially because I know that there are people who will buy those pieces because of the brand names. Don't do it! For $2000 you could buy 10 pairs of even more flattering, versatile jeans than those Balmains! And let's me honest, hammer pants are always a no.
Image Sources:
Bottega Veneta pants: net-a-porter.com, Balmain jeans: net-a-porter.com, Lanvin gown: net-a-porter.com, Valentino gown: net-a-porter.com.
Bottega Veneta Belted Slouched Leather Pants, $4,500 at net-a-porter.com, Balmain Buttoned Low-rise Flared Jeans, $2,490 at net-a-porter.com: I don't think that anyone should buy MC Hammer pants ever, really. And leather MC Hammer pants? No way. But leather MC Hammer/harem pants that cost over FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS. That's not even bad anyone, it's just funny. I want to know who the market is for this. Who is buying these? There is no way that they're worth the price. How much engineering goes into a pair of harem pants? Um, not much. The same goes for these jeans. Oooh, they're Balmain. Are the buttons silver? No. Are there diamonds woven into the cotton? No. It's just a pair of cotton jeans with a bit of stretch and way too many buttons and zippers. Don't get me wrong, the cut is really flattering, but 7 For All Mankind makes a pair of jeans with that exact cut for less than $200, and it probably fits just as well. Sometimes you really are paying for the name instead of the actual product. Sometimes that's okay, as with really iconic pieces--a Chanel 2.55, a pair of Louboutins. But a pair of jeans? Nope.
Lanvin Ostrich Feather-Trimmed Georgette Gown, $6,720 at net-a-porter.com, Valentino One-Shoulder Silk Gown, $6,990 at net-a-porter.com: When a multi-thousand price tag is worth it to me (in the imaginary world where I have that money to spend), is when the materials used are really high quality and the construction involved is flawless. Look at these two gowns. It's just a coincidence that it's the battle of pants vs. dresses here, by the way. The Valentino dress is almost worth it because of the immpecable quality of the cut and the draping. That looks like a $7,000 dress. The price tag isn't surprising. It's modern, it's timeless, it's impossibly flattering, and chic and yet sexy. You could wear it over and over again without it being dated. The Lanvin gown gets some of the cost from all those ostrich feathers. I feel like Lanvin is one of the brands that justifies it's prices really well. Lanvin pieces are always well constructed, perfectly thought out, polished, and fun. Just look at this gown! It screams red carpet. The materials are so luxurious, the '20s inspired cut will never be dated, and the white is such a versatile color--it could even be a wedding dress.
I know this is a really random post, but I saw those pairs of pants today on Net-A-Porter and literally almost had a mental breakdown, especially because I know that there are people who will buy those pieces because of the brand names. Don't do it! For $2000 you could buy 10 pairs of even more flattering, versatile jeans than those Balmains! And let's me honest, hammer pants are always a no.
Image Sources:
Bottega Veneta pants: net-a-porter.com, Balmain jeans: net-a-porter.com, Lanvin gown: net-a-porter.com, Valentino gown: net-a-porter.com.
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Epic Win and Epic Fail
It happened. The awesome Spanish world cup sweatshirt I ordered came in the mail today. It's perfection. It was a $26 sweatshirt, so I wasn't expecting a lot, but it's actually pretty nice. I tried to get iPhoto to flip the picture, but it hates me. So practice your backwards reading, I guess? (Look how long my hair is! YES).
My number one pet peeve with sweatshirts is heavy sweatshirts with tiny neck hole that strangle you with the weight of the hood. This sweatshirt is the exact opposite of all of those, and it helps me support my delicious Spanish footballers. WIN.
Also, like my yellow boxer shorts. They have tiny elephants holding martinis on them! My school mascot is an elephant. THEY ARE SO CUTE. I'd totally link them, but I can't find them on the J. Crew website. Grrr.
On a much more serious note, I wanted to just touch on the MAC/Rodarte controversy. For those of you that don't know, the Rodarte for MAC collection is inspired by the designers' trip to Mexico, and has products with names like Juarez and Quinceanera. The issue with this is that Juarez has been for years now the center of serious femicides, targeted mainly at young women working in factories there, many of whom will never reach their Quinceaneras. I'm not an expert on this by any means, and you can read more about it here. What I find really distasteful is that MAC also put a lip pencil in this that takes the color out of your lips and basically makes you look like a corpse. Oy ve. Under pressure, MAC released a statement saying that they would change some of the names and give an unspecified amount of money to a charity organization helping to deal with this tragedy.
Personally, I never made the Juarez-femicide-makeup connection until it lit up the blogosphere, and while I think some of the items in this collection look great, I won't be buying any of them. It seems distasteful. I'd rather use my money to make a personal donation to help the women of Juarez. And now I'll get down off my soap box and go back to being a spazzy blogger.
UPDATE:
MAC has decided to change (I think) all of the product names and donate $100,000 to women's organizations in Juarez, which you can read more about here. I'm really pleased that bloggers managed to pressure MAC into turning this into something very positive, but still put off by the fact that MAC did this in the first place. So I guess I'll wait and see what the products look like and what the new names are before I make any shopping plans.
My number one pet peeve with sweatshirts is heavy sweatshirts with tiny neck hole that strangle you with the weight of the hood. This sweatshirt is the exact opposite of all of those, and it helps me support my delicious Spanish footballers. WIN.
Also, like my yellow boxer shorts. They have tiny elephants holding martinis on them! My school mascot is an elephant. THEY ARE SO CUTE. I'd totally link them, but I can't find them on the J. Crew website. Grrr.
On a much more serious note, I wanted to just touch on the MAC/Rodarte controversy. For those of you that don't know, the Rodarte for MAC collection is inspired by the designers' trip to Mexico, and has products with names like Juarez and Quinceanera. The issue with this is that Juarez has been for years now the center of serious femicides, targeted mainly at young women working in factories there, many of whom will never reach their Quinceaneras. I'm not an expert on this by any means, and you can read more about it here. What I find really distasteful is that MAC also put a lip pencil in this that takes the color out of your lips and basically makes you look like a corpse. Oy ve. Under pressure, MAC released a statement saying that they would change some of the names and give an unspecified amount of money to a charity organization helping to deal with this tragedy.
Personally, I never made the Juarez-femicide-makeup connection until it lit up the blogosphere, and while I think some of the items in this collection look great, I won't be buying any of them. It seems distasteful. I'd rather use my money to make a personal donation to help the women of Juarez. And now I'll get down off my soap box and go back to being a spazzy blogger.
UPDATE:
MAC has decided to change (I think) all of the product names and donate $100,000 to women's organizations in Juarez, which you can read more about here. I'm really pleased that bloggers managed to pressure MAC into turning this into something very positive, but still put off by the fact that MAC did this in the first place. So I guess I'll wait and see what the products look like and what the new names are before I make any shopping plans.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Lush!, and Evil Mousse
I went to LUSH today! It was a spur of the moment thing and I didn't actually get that much, but of course now I'm completely obsessed. But more on that later.
L'Oreal Glossy Volume Mousse, $4.99 at drugstore.com, Dove Body & Lift Volumizing Mousse, $11.97 for 3 at amazon.com: So two or three days ago I ran out of my usual Dove mousse, and when I stopped by the grocery store on the way home, they were out, so I grabbed this L'Oreal mousse that I remembered hearing a good review of somewhere. I usually stick with my Dove mousse, but when I can't find it I just get something else, usually Tresemme, and it's fine. Well. This mousse smells good. That's about it. The consistency is both very watery and very airy. It feels a little runny, and instead of coming out smoothly, it comes out full of giant air holes and feels like it's going to collapse at any second. Because of the texture, I put more mousse in my hair than usual. I just didn't feel like it was going to do anything. But I forgot about it and went to sleep, and when I woke up the next morning...OMG. The volume situation was less than average, but the real kicker was that my hair felt greasy, matted, and like it had a month's worth of product build-up. It looked dull and dirty. My biggest hair quirk is that I play with my hair all the time, so it needs to feel soft and clean. Fail. Epic, epic fail. I don't like to write entirely negative reviews because I feel like sometimes products that don't work for me will work for other people, but I can't see this working for anyone. I would never, ever repurchase. It's headed straight for the recycling. I highly recommend this Dove mousse. It has the consistency of thick whipped cream, leaves absolutely no residue, and gives lovely volume and softness.


LUSH Honey I Washed the Kids soap: After I hit up the Victoria's Secret semi-annual sale today (I like to stock up on Pink sweats yearly for school), I wandered over to LUSH. To me, LUSH is a little like MAC (or at least how MAC felt initially). It's full of a ton of products that I don't really understand the use of initially. But, the sales girl was so helpful and friendly that I instantly felt comfortable. I didn't want to go overboard the first time I shopped there, so I just got about $6 worth of the Honey I Washed the Kids soap. Now, on the website you get 3.5 oz for $6.95, and when I watched blogger videos about LUSH everyone had these giants chunks of soap, so I assumed that was how much you get for $6.95. Nope. The bit I have is about 3/4 of an inch thick and the size of my palm. But, it smells SO amazing (SO AMAZING), has a lovely layer of honeycomb, and this very interesting, almost spongy consistency that seems really moisturizing and like it will lather up nicely, so I'm a happy camper. I'm assuming that it'll be fantastic when I use it in the shower later, but if it isn't I'll update and let y'all know.
Now that I've got my feet wet with LUSH, I have a few more things bookmarked for my next LUSH trip. When I got my soap today, I also got this newspaper-esque catalog of all their products (so cute), and just spent half an hour going through it.
LUSH: Karma Komba Solid Shampoo, $9.95 at lushusa.com, Jungle Conditioner, $10.95 at lushusa.com: Their solid shampoos and conditioners have such fab reviews and apparently last a really long time, so they'd end up being cheaper and more eco-friendly than bottled shampoos/conditioners. Win-win. The Karma Komba shampoo has patchouli, lemon, and orange, and is supposed to give you great shine and a fab smell all day. The Jungle conditioner has avocado, bananas, and cocoa butter, and gives intense moisture without residue, which is pretty much the best thing ever. Shiny hair that smells like a rainforest? Sign me up. Plus, these would be so much easier to travel with than bottled shampoos/conditioners! Oooh...
LUSH: Chai Shower Gel, $17.95 at lushusa.com, Porridge Soap, $6.95 at lushusa.com: Um, they make Chai shower gel. Legit chai, with tea, ginger, cinnamon, lemon, and allspice, and all of that in LUSH's moisturizing and eco-friendly formula. There's nothing else I can say. I want it. As for this porridge soap, it has oats, orange juice, and orange oil, for moisture and exfoliation. This would be the perfect thing to use pre-shave or pre-tanning. Do you guys have any LUSH recommendations? Let me know!
Shoes of Prey Heels, both $280 at shoesofprey.com: This is totally unrelated, but I just saw it in a YouTube video, and I'm a little obsessed. It's this site where you can custom make shoes, design, colors, fabrics, and sizes, and all that for just over $300 with shipping. These aren't the must representative pics, but they have literally every style and fabric imaginable, and the finished products look insanely gorgeous. For people like me, who are crazy picky about their shoes, this is a miracle.
Image Sources:
L'Oreal mousse: drugstore.com, Dove mousse: amazon.com, LUSH: honey I washed the kids: mscinderfella.blogspot.com, solid shampoo: lushusa.com, solid conditioner: lushusa.com, shower gel: lushusa.com, porridge soap: lushusa.com, Shoes of Prey heels: shoesofprey.com, shoesofprey.com.
L'Oreal Glossy Volume Mousse, $4.99 at drugstore.com, Dove Body & Lift Volumizing Mousse, $11.97 for 3 at amazon.com: So two or three days ago I ran out of my usual Dove mousse, and when I stopped by the grocery store on the way home, they were out, so I grabbed this L'Oreal mousse that I remembered hearing a good review of somewhere. I usually stick with my Dove mousse, but when I can't find it I just get something else, usually Tresemme, and it's fine. Well. This mousse smells good. That's about it. The consistency is both very watery and very airy. It feels a little runny, and instead of coming out smoothly, it comes out full of giant air holes and feels like it's going to collapse at any second. Because of the texture, I put more mousse in my hair than usual. I just didn't feel like it was going to do anything. But I forgot about it and went to sleep, and when I woke up the next morning...OMG. The volume situation was less than average, but the real kicker was that my hair felt greasy, matted, and like it had a month's worth of product build-up. It looked dull and dirty. My biggest hair quirk is that I play with my hair all the time, so it needs to feel soft and clean. Fail. Epic, epic fail. I don't like to write entirely negative reviews because I feel like sometimes products that don't work for me will work for other people, but I can't see this working for anyone. I would never, ever repurchase. It's headed straight for the recycling. I highly recommend this Dove mousse. It has the consistency of thick whipped cream, leaves absolutely no residue, and gives lovely volume and softness.
LUSH Honey I Washed the Kids soap: After I hit up the Victoria's Secret semi-annual sale today (I like to stock up on Pink sweats yearly for school), I wandered over to LUSH. To me, LUSH is a little like MAC (or at least how MAC felt initially). It's full of a ton of products that I don't really understand the use of initially. But, the sales girl was so helpful and friendly that I instantly felt comfortable. I didn't want to go overboard the first time I shopped there, so I just got about $6 worth of the Honey I Washed the Kids soap. Now, on the website you get 3.5 oz for $6.95, and when I watched blogger videos about LUSH everyone had these giants chunks of soap, so I assumed that was how much you get for $6.95. Nope. The bit I have is about 3/4 of an inch thick and the size of my palm. But, it smells SO amazing (SO AMAZING), has a lovely layer of honeycomb, and this very interesting, almost spongy consistency that seems really moisturizing and like it will lather up nicely, so I'm a happy camper. I'm assuming that it'll be fantastic when I use it in the shower later, but if it isn't I'll update and let y'all know.
Now that I've got my feet wet with LUSH, I have a few more things bookmarked for my next LUSH trip. When I got my soap today, I also got this newspaper-esque catalog of all their products (so cute), and just spent half an hour going through it.
LUSH: Karma Komba Solid Shampoo, $9.95 at lushusa.com, Jungle Conditioner, $10.95 at lushusa.com: Their solid shampoos and conditioners have such fab reviews and apparently last a really long time, so they'd end up being cheaper and more eco-friendly than bottled shampoos/conditioners. Win-win. The Karma Komba shampoo has patchouli, lemon, and orange, and is supposed to give you great shine and a fab smell all day. The Jungle conditioner has avocado, bananas, and cocoa butter, and gives intense moisture without residue, which is pretty much the best thing ever. Shiny hair that smells like a rainforest? Sign me up. Plus, these would be so much easier to travel with than bottled shampoos/conditioners! Oooh...
LUSH: Chai Shower Gel, $17.95 at lushusa.com, Porridge Soap, $6.95 at lushusa.com: Um, they make Chai shower gel. Legit chai, with tea, ginger, cinnamon, lemon, and allspice, and all of that in LUSH's moisturizing and eco-friendly formula. There's nothing else I can say. I want it. As for this porridge soap, it has oats, orange juice, and orange oil, for moisture and exfoliation. This would be the perfect thing to use pre-shave or pre-tanning. Do you guys have any LUSH recommendations? Let me know!
Shoes of Prey Heels, both $280 at shoesofprey.com: This is totally unrelated, but I just saw it in a YouTube video, and I'm a little obsessed. It's this site where you can custom make shoes, design, colors, fabrics, and sizes, and all that for just over $300 with shipping. These aren't the must representative pics, but they have literally every style and fabric imaginable, and the finished products look insanely gorgeous. For people like me, who are crazy picky about their shoes, this is a miracle.
Image Sources:
L'Oreal mousse: drugstore.com, Dove mousse: amazon.com, LUSH: honey I washed the kids: mscinderfella.blogspot.com, solid shampoo: lushusa.com, solid conditioner: lushusa.com, shower gel: lushusa.com, porridge soap: lushusa.com, Shoes of Prey heels: shoesofprey.com, shoesofprey.com.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
A Treatise on Leggings
Hey guys! So I totally forgot to warn you all that this week is going to be really, really bad for blogging. I have a final on Wednesday, a paper due Friday, and between now and Friday I have to pack up my entire life (pretty much) and get my butt back to California. Which means that, as much as I love to use blogging at a legitimate procrastination tool, you guys may not hear much from me this week. I know. I hate it.
To tide you guys over until the next time I can post, here's an article that I total forgot to tell you guys about. I've been doing a column for the Tufts Observer, our biweekly campus magazine, for the last month or two, and since it's about fashion, I can't believe I didn't think to put it on the blog.
Anyways, here's the link to one of my articles, or if you're too lazy to click that, I'll put the text below.
xoxoxo,
Megan
PS: There are lots of Tufts-centric references that won't really make sense unless you go here, so just ignore those.
"Fellow Jumbos, we need to talk. There’s a growing epidemic on campus, and I want to bring it to your awareness so that you can take the appropriate measures to protect yourself. This disease is particularly dangerous because it is easily mistaken for its innocuous cousin. That’s right. I’m talking about leggings masquerading as pants.
Tufts is clearly full of smart, interesting people, and it is time that we started dressing the part. I think we need to establish some boundaries for what’s appropriate to wear in public and what should stay hidden away in the safety of your dorm room. Now, I have nothing against leggings themselves. They can be very helpful layering tools or can add an interesting edge to an outfit. However, let’s not forget that leggings are basically footless tights.
Would you wear tights as pants? Probably not. So why are leggings becoming an acceptable alternative to pants? Pants are constructed from a thick, durable fabric that skims over all of your business. Leggings are made out of extremely thin, often sheer fabric, that reveals more than it hides, and trust me, as I’m hiking up to Olin, I do not need to become that familiar with your lady parts. If I can see your panty line or if there’s some camel-toe action, it’s probably not okay to wear in public.
I know that the line between acceptable and indecent use of leggings can be blurry, so I’ve come up with a few general guidelines to help everyone avoid public exposure. After all, NQR only comes one day a year, and if your private bits are on display every other day it’s just not as special anymore.
Now, the rules are very simple. In fact, there are only three of them.
If you can get into Tufts, I’m pretty sure you can handle those three rules. I know I might sound like a crazy leggings tyrant, but I think that, as a campus, we can step it up. A lot. Why not look as awesome as we are?"
To tide you guys over until the next time I can post, here's an article that I total forgot to tell you guys about. I've been doing a column for the Tufts Observer, our biweekly campus magazine, for the last month or two, and since it's about fashion, I can't believe I didn't think to put it on the blog.
Anyways, here's the link to one of my articles, or if you're too lazy to click that, I'll put the text below.
xoxoxo,
Megan
PS: There are lots of Tufts-centric references that won't really make sense unless you go here, so just ignore those.
"Fellow Jumbos, we need to talk. There’s a growing epidemic on campus, and I want to bring it to your awareness so that you can take the appropriate measures to protect yourself. This disease is particularly dangerous because it is easily mistaken for its innocuous cousin. That’s right. I’m talking about leggings masquerading as pants.
Tufts is clearly full of smart, interesting people, and it is time that we started dressing the part. I think we need to establish some boundaries for what’s appropriate to wear in public and what should stay hidden away in the safety of your dorm room. Now, I have nothing against leggings themselves. They can be very helpful layering tools or can add an interesting edge to an outfit. However, let’s not forget that leggings are basically footless tights.
Would you wear tights as pants? Probably not. So why are leggings becoming an acceptable alternative to pants? Pants are constructed from a thick, durable fabric that skims over all of your business. Leggings are made out of extremely thin, often sheer fabric, that reveals more than it hides, and trust me, as I’m hiking up to Olin, I do not need to become that familiar with your lady parts. If I can see your panty line or if there’s some camel-toe action, it’s probably not okay to wear in public.
I know that the line between acceptable and indecent use of leggings can be blurry, so I’ve come up with a few general guidelines to help everyone avoid public exposure. After all, NQR only comes one day a year, and if your private bits are on display every other day it’s just not as special anymore.
Now, the rules are very simple. In fact, there are only three of them.
1. If you are wearing leggings, you need to wear something that covers your butt with an inch or two to spare. That’s it. Why does your booty need to be covered? Well, when you’re wearing leggings and your butt isn’t covered, everyone can see all the details of your behind. Don’t believe me? Check yourself out in a mirror next time before heading out and ask if that’s appropriate to wear in an environment where your 60-year-old chemistry professor hangs out. It’s basically the equivalent of wearing a bikini bottom out in public, because that’s about how much leggings hide. So, throw on a long button-up shirt or an oversized cardigan, or even a tunic. You get all the comfort of leggings with the added advantage of being able to run into said professor without feeling insanely awkward.
2. When wearing leggings, make sure that they’re actually opaque and not ripped or covered in cutouts. I know it sounds silly, but you’re already kind of pushing the line of good taste by pretending that leggings are pants. It’s socially acceptable now, but when you add in sheer leggings, leggings with cutouts, leggings that are full with rips and tears, you start going beyond that line. Sheer leggings are pretty much the same thing as tights without feet. Would you wear sheer tights and a slightly oversized t-shirt out in public? That’s a trick question. The answer should be no. The same goes for leggings that show extra skin. Those leggings are already hugging all your curves, including some that should stay private. When you show even more skin on top of that, you start heading towards a dangerous, Pretty Woman sort of place. Julia Roberts can pull that look off, but the rest of us should leave that to the movies. As my grandma would say, it’s better to leave something to the imagination.
3. Never, ever wear leggings with Uggs. I know, it sounds amazingly comfy. But, leggings are inherently extremely casual, and though when they’re styled correctly they can be worn in place of pants, when you pair them with something else as casual as Uggs, it doesn’t work. Uggs are a necessity for Boston weather, I understand, but I think we can all agree that they’re only appropriate for when it’s in the 40’s or below outside. When it’s less than 40 degrees outside, why would you be wearing leggings? It just doesn’t make sense
4. Exceptions to Rule #1: That’s right, there’s an exception. I’m not that unrealistic. You can wear leggings with a regular shirt when, and only when, you’re heading over to Gantcher or the track for a workout. Leggings at the gym are totally acceptable as long as they follow Rule #2. Wearing sheer leggings or leggings with cutouts to the gym is just impractical.
If you can get into Tufts, I’m pretty sure you can handle those three rules. I know I might sound like a crazy leggings tyrant, but I think that, as a campus, we can step it up. A lot. Why not look as awesome as we are?"
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
The Funniest Thing You'll See All Week
It's this new Miley Cyrus video. I promise. Words don't even suffice to describe how ridiculous it is. It's like early Britney Spears and Night at the Museum had a baby and it was raised by rabid condors (just go with it). The song isn't her worst, but it's certainly not her best. I mean, it's called "Can't Be Tamed" if that gives you any idea of the quality. Although the makeup is hilarious.
As a little palette cleanser, here's Beyonce's newest video, "Why Don't You Love Me." On first glance it's just amazing costumes and adorably kitschy cinematography, but I think she's making an interesting point. By setting the song, which centers on how upset/annoyed she is that some guy doesn't love her, in such an old-fashioned, almost cheesy environment, it seems like she's saying that the sentiment itself is outdated, and that no girl needs to mope around the house in lingerie crying about how some boy doesn't love her. Props for that, Beyonce. Makes much more sense than whatever Miley was selling.
"Why Don't You Love Me" - Beyoncé from Beyoncé on Vimeo.
On a totally different note, I found a closeup of Sienna Miller's makeup from the Met Gala, and LOVES it. She's definitely channeling Bridget Bardotte here, with the heavy gel liner/lashes and the teased, half-up hairstyle. I think the softness of her hair and the lack of anything on her lower lashline keeps it really modern and fresh, as does that impressive display of cleavage. You know there has to be a whole roll of double-sided tape hiding in there somewhere.
Have I mentioned yet that today's theme is randomness? So in my unrealistic dream world where I'm an insanely rich eccentric jet-setter person, my house/NYC apartment will be filled exclusively with things from ABC Carpet & Home and Jonathan Adler.
Jonathan Adler: Junior Templeton Chair, $995 at jonathanadler.com, Woodhouse Queen Bed, $2,500 at jonathanadler.com, Prozac Jar, $80 at jonathanadler.com: How adorable is this chair? Answer: so adorable. The fuchsia is so crisp and fun against the white wood, and it manages to strike the visual balance between comfortable and tailored. I just want to curl up in it with a cup of chai and watch Pride and Prejudice. Or play out some other oddly specific daydream. The fact that this bed is called Woodhouse makes me think it was designed with Emma Woodhouse, Jane Austen's protagonist, in mind, which makes me love it even more. I'm really feeling upholstered headboards for some reason, and I love the way that the headboard has so many elaborate curves, but the rest of the bed is so simple and streamlined. The dove grey hue is also insanely chic. It might just be my twisted brain, but I'm highly amused by the idea of keeping makeup or cookies (even better!) in a circus-themed jar that says "Prozac" on it, because both of those things make me happy just like Prozac would. Oh, Jonathan Adler. So clever in his Valley of the Dolls sort of way.
Image Sources:
Sienna Miller: glamour.com, Beyonce video: jezebel.com, Miley Cyrus video: huffingtonpost.com, Jonathan Adler: chair: jonathanadler.com, bed: jonathanadler.com, jar: jonathanadler.com, dog: jonathanadler.com, rug: jonathanadler.com, pillow: jonathanadler.com.
As a little palette cleanser, here's Beyonce's newest video, "Why Don't You Love Me." On first glance it's just amazing costumes and adorably kitschy cinematography, but I think she's making an interesting point. By setting the song, which centers on how upset/annoyed she is that some guy doesn't love her, in such an old-fashioned, almost cheesy environment, it seems like she's saying that the sentiment itself is outdated, and that no girl needs to mope around the house in lingerie crying about how some boy doesn't love her. Props for that, Beyonce. Makes much more sense than whatever Miley was selling.
"Why Don't You Love Me" - Beyoncé from Beyoncé on Vimeo.
On a totally different note, I found a closeup of Sienna Miller's makeup from the Met Gala, and LOVES it. She's definitely channeling Bridget Bardotte here, with the heavy gel liner/lashes and the teased, half-up hairstyle. I think the softness of her hair and the lack of anything on her lower lashline keeps it really modern and fresh, as does that impressive display of cleavage. You know there has to be a whole roll of double-sided tape hiding in there somewhere.
Have I mentioned yet that today's theme is randomness? So in my unrealistic dream world where I'm an insanely rich eccentric jet-setter person, my house/NYC apartment will be filled exclusively with things from ABC Carpet & Home and Jonathan Adler.
Jonathan Adler: Junior Templeton Chair, $995 at jonathanadler.com, Woodhouse Queen Bed, $2,500 at jonathanadler.com, Prozac Jar, $80 at jonathanadler.com: How adorable is this chair? Answer: so adorable. The fuchsia is so crisp and fun against the white wood, and it manages to strike the visual balance between comfortable and tailored. I just want to curl up in it with a cup of chai and watch Pride and Prejudice. Or play out some other oddly specific daydream. The fact that this bed is called Woodhouse makes me think it was designed with Emma Woodhouse, Jane Austen's protagonist, in mind, which makes me love it even more. I'm really feeling upholstered headboards for some reason, and I love the way that the headboard has so many elaborate curves, but the rest of the bed is so simple and streamlined. The dove grey hue is also insanely chic. It might just be my twisted brain, but I'm highly amused by the idea of keeping makeup or cookies (even better!) in a circus-themed jar that says "Prozac" on it, because both of those things make me happy just like Prozac would. Oh, Jonathan Adler. So clever in his Valley of the Dolls sort of way.
Leather Terrier, $695 at jonathanadler.com, Zebra British Flag Rug, $995 at jonathanadler.com, British Flag Pillow, $98 at jonathanadler.com: I realize that this is fully ridiculous, but yes, I would have a full-sized statue of a terrier in my house that my real terrier would run around and play with. And I would give them matching collars, and it would be too cute for words. I'm normal, I promise. I think the idea of a British-flag printed zebra rug is so, so cheeky. I love anything with a British flag on it, and juxtaposing that counter-culture icon with something as quintessentially rich preppy as a zebra rug is just genius. And for another take on the British flag, this cheerful pillow would brighten up any bed or couch. The unexpected color scheme is a really fun new twist, but it also comes in its actual colors if that's your thing.
Image Sources:
Sienna Miller: glamour.com, Beyonce video: jezebel.com, Miley Cyrus video: huffingtonpost.com, Jonathan Adler: chair: jonathanadler.com, bed: jonathanadler.com, jar: jonathanadler.com, dog: jonathanadler.com, rug: jonathanadler.com, pillow: jonathanadler.com.
Labels:
ewww,
hollywood,
lust objects,
music,
random,
red carpet,
shopping
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
NY Bridal Fashion Week and Barbie
Remember how I said that my Mac was being evil and grumpy? Well it died yesterday morning, and then miraculously resurrected itself in the afternoon, hence the late posting.
Vera Wang, Carolina Herrera: I think I've confessed my love for Bridal Fashion Week before, but I'll do it again. So many pretty things. So many. I know that Vera Wang is the epitome of bridal for most people, but I've never been a huge fan of her wedding dresses. This dress, however, I love. It's soft, but structured, ethereal, but not too fairy-princessy, flattering, but also concealing. It's pretty much low-maintenance glamour at its highest. Carolina Herrera isn't someone that comes to mind when I think bridal, but isn't this dress lovely? The neckline is a little unconventional, but it would be so perfect for a beach wedding with the slight halter vibe. The detail at the waist keeps it from being too casual, and the soft lines of the skirt would flow so, so perfectly on a breezy beach afternoon.
Jenny Packham, Junko Yoshioka: I'm 90% sure that Miley Cyrus wore a variation of this Jenny Packham dress to the Oscars and I hated it, but here for some reason it works. Maybe because it actually fits. Obviously this is a little on the retro/sexbomb side for a traditional wedding, but I think with the right attitude it would come across as classy instead of too in-your-face. The bustier top is very in at the moment, and the voluminous a-line skirt contrasts the structure of the top perfectly. I've never heard of Junko Yoshioka before, but if she makes dresses like this all the time, we all need to watch out for her. This dress is organic, but soft and romantic, clean-lined, but not stark. It really is a study in opposites, but doesn't come across as too fashion forward or statement-making to wear to an event that will be immortalized in pictures literally FOREVER.


Both Oscar de la Renta: Oh, Oscar. No one does ball gowns like he does, or wedding dresses for that matter. I absolutely love the way he combines tactile skirts with streamlined, structured bodices. It's a great, flattering way to do high-contrast in a wedding dress, because it highlights your smallest part (your waist) and your collarbone, but also skims over any potential problem areas in the hip region. The version on the left is a little more subtle and modern, with the light floral applique skirt, and the dress on the right is more full-blown romantic--doesn't it almost look like feathers flowing in the wind? So lovely.


Oscar de la Renta, Reem Acra: I don't really see where this dress fits into Oscar's bridal vision, well, at all, but it does really remind me of that moment in Gone with the Wind when Scarlett's wearing this black dress and supposed to be mourning a dead husband, but ends up being the center of attention and a total drama queen instead. And it's totally gorgeous, and I'm pretty sure those appliques are in the shape of butterflies, which is totally killing the 6 year old in me. I think Reem Acra might be one of my favorite wedding dress designers (she's right up there with Monique Lhuillier). Just look at the cut on this dress--it's so, so flattering, soft without being sloppy, clean but not minimalist, romantic but not sappy. The off-white hue is so lovely, and the tulle overlay on the skirt makes me want to twirl around in it for hours.


David Lerner Lace Front Shorts, $88 at shopbop.com: And as a palate cleanser from all that gorgeousness, here are some lace-front bike shorts! I was trying to figure out why Shopbop wasn't showing a front picture, and then I realized that the lace isn't just on the legs, it's all across the front. Which means that you either wear underwear and everyone sees, or you don't wear underwear and yet arrested for indecent exposure. And did I mention that they're BIKESHORTS?
Alkemie Jewelry Octopus Ring, $155 at shopbop.com, Anemone Barbie by Christian Louboutin, $150 at net-a-porter.com: On a prettier note, how adorable is this octopus ring? I clearly have a thing for jewelry with awkward animals on it, and this octopus is no exception. How unexpected would this be just chilling on your ring finger? It's odd, and the rough-hewn texture only adds to the organic feel, but there's something so elegant about it at the same time, with the graceful curves of the octopus' legs. Christian Louboutin came out with another Barbie! I die. Not only does she come in a fab red carpet gown, but she also comes with four pairs of shoes that I would personally do terrible things to own in big girl sizes, especially those mules on the left. And this Barbie has red hair! I don't think she's ever been more glamorous.


Daisy Knights Kim Gold-Vermeil Skull Stud Earrings, $150 at net-a-porter.com, Diane von Fursternberg Ferdon Snake-Print Dress, $200 at net-a-porter.com: In the same vein as awkward animal jewelry, I love tiny earrings with weird things on them. They look like basic studs from a distance, but when you get up close you realize that they're really something awesomely offbeat and interesting. These tiny skulls remind me of the calaveras that you see on Day of the Dead, and the primitive nature of the shape and cut of the skulls almost makes them less creepy and kind of adorable. They're like the Caspers of the ghost world, endearing instead of frightening. I don't think I've ever seen a snake print dress before, but I'm kind of loving this DVF version. The snake print comes across as really fun and summery because of the tropical color palette, and the simplicity of the cut balances out the high-impact print perfectly. It's such an offbeat take on the traditional sundress, and would be fab with a pair of brown leather sandals, a gold pendant necklace, and some oversized Wayfarers.


Image Sources:
Vera Wang: nymag.com, Carolina Herrera: nymag.com, Jenny Packham: nymag.com, Junko Yoshioka: nymag.com, Oscar de la Renta: nymag.com, Reem Acra: nymag.com, David Lerner shorts: shopbop.com, Alkemie Jewelry ring: shopbop.com, Barbie: net-a-porter.com, Daisy Knights earrings: net-a-porter.com, DVF dress: net-a-porter.com.
Vera Wang, Carolina Herrera: I think I've confessed my love for Bridal Fashion Week before, but I'll do it again. So many pretty things. So many. I know that Vera Wang is the epitome of bridal for most people, but I've never been a huge fan of her wedding dresses. This dress, however, I love. It's soft, but structured, ethereal, but not too fairy-princessy, flattering, but also concealing. It's pretty much low-maintenance glamour at its highest. Carolina Herrera isn't someone that comes to mind when I think bridal, but isn't this dress lovely? The neckline is a little unconventional, but it would be so perfect for a beach wedding with the slight halter vibe. The detail at the waist keeps it from being too casual, and the soft lines of the skirt would flow so, so perfectly on a breezy beach afternoon.
Jenny Packham, Junko Yoshioka: I'm 90% sure that Miley Cyrus wore a variation of this Jenny Packham dress to the Oscars and I hated it, but here for some reason it works. Maybe because it actually fits. Obviously this is a little on the retro/sexbomb side for a traditional wedding, but I think with the right attitude it would come across as classy instead of too in-your-face. The bustier top is very in at the moment, and the voluminous a-line skirt contrasts the structure of the top perfectly. I've never heard of Junko Yoshioka before, but if she makes dresses like this all the time, we all need to watch out for her. This dress is organic, but soft and romantic, clean-lined, but not stark. It really is a study in opposites, but doesn't come across as too fashion forward or statement-making to wear to an event that will be immortalized in pictures literally FOREVER.
Both Oscar de la Renta: Oh, Oscar. No one does ball gowns like he does, or wedding dresses for that matter. I absolutely love the way he combines tactile skirts with streamlined, structured bodices. It's a great, flattering way to do high-contrast in a wedding dress, because it highlights your smallest part (your waist) and your collarbone, but also skims over any potential problem areas in the hip region. The version on the left is a little more subtle and modern, with the light floral applique skirt, and the dress on the right is more full-blown romantic--doesn't it almost look like feathers flowing in the wind? So lovely.
Oscar de la Renta, Reem Acra: I don't really see where this dress fits into Oscar's bridal vision, well, at all, but it does really remind me of that moment in Gone with the Wind when Scarlett's wearing this black dress and supposed to be mourning a dead husband, but ends up being the center of attention and a total drama queen instead. And it's totally gorgeous, and I'm pretty sure those appliques are in the shape of butterflies, which is totally killing the 6 year old in me. I think Reem Acra might be one of my favorite wedding dress designers (she's right up there with Monique Lhuillier). Just look at the cut on this dress--it's so, so flattering, soft without being sloppy, clean but not minimalist, romantic but not sappy. The off-white hue is so lovely, and the tulle overlay on the skirt makes me want to twirl around in it for hours.
David Lerner Lace Front Shorts, $88 at shopbop.com: And as a palate cleanser from all that gorgeousness, here are some lace-front bike shorts! I was trying to figure out why Shopbop wasn't showing a front picture, and then I realized that the lace isn't just on the legs, it's all across the front. Which means that you either wear underwear and everyone sees, or you don't wear underwear and yet arrested for indecent exposure. And did I mention that they're BIKESHORTS?
Alkemie Jewelry Octopus Ring, $155 at shopbop.com, Anemone Barbie by Christian Louboutin, $150 at net-a-porter.com: On a prettier note, how adorable is this octopus ring? I clearly have a thing for jewelry with awkward animals on it, and this octopus is no exception. How unexpected would this be just chilling on your ring finger? It's odd, and the rough-hewn texture only adds to the organic feel, but there's something so elegant about it at the same time, with the graceful curves of the octopus' legs. Christian Louboutin came out with another Barbie! I die. Not only does she come in a fab red carpet gown, but she also comes with four pairs of shoes that I would personally do terrible things to own in big girl sizes, especially those mules on the left. And this Barbie has red hair! I don't think she's ever been more glamorous.
Daisy Knights Kim Gold-Vermeil Skull Stud Earrings, $150 at net-a-porter.com, Diane von Fursternberg Ferdon Snake-Print Dress, $200 at net-a-porter.com: In the same vein as awkward animal jewelry, I love tiny earrings with weird things on them. They look like basic studs from a distance, but when you get up close you realize that they're really something awesomely offbeat and interesting. These tiny skulls remind me of the calaveras that you see on Day of the Dead, and the primitive nature of the shape and cut of the skulls almost makes them less creepy and kind of adorable. They're like the Caspers of the ghost world, endearing instead of frightening. I don't think I've ever seen a snake print dress before, but I'm kind of loving this DVF version. The snake print comes across as really fun and summery because of the tropical color palette, and the simplicity of the cut balances out the high-impact print perfectly. It's such an offbeat take on the traditional sundress, and would be fab with a pair of brown leather sandals, a gold pendant necklace, and some oversized Wayfarers.
Image Sources:
Vera Wang: nymag.com, Carolina Herrera: nymag.com, Jenny Packham: nymag.com, Junko Yoshioka: nymag.com, Oscar de la Renta: nymag.com, Reem Acra: nymag.com, David Lerner shorts: shopbop.com, Alkemie Jewelry ring: shopbop.com, Barbie: net-a-porter.com, Daisy Knights earrings: net-a-porter.com, DVF dress: net-a-porter.com.
Labels:
ewww,
jewelry,
lust objects,
personal style,
random,
runway,
shopping
Friday, April 23, 2010
Lazy Friday
Sometimes after I have a really high-stress week, all I want to do is lounge around in my room and watch Gilmore Girls. Of course, I also feel the need to always look cute during said lounging, which is harder than it sounds. Scroll down for a few options that are comfy and adorable.
But first, this ridiculous fragrance ad from Kimora Lee Simmons. Not only is it blatantly obvious that that is not her body, but apparently the retouchers took her lower half straight off of Daria Werbowy on the cover of Vogue in 2005. Even the shorts are the same. I understand that retouching is pretty much a given in campaign shots, but stealing half of someone else's body? Just weird.

Viv & Ingrid Black Diamond Swarovski Mini Bobby Pair, $36 at vivandingrid.com, Chanel Nail Polish in Versailles: I have trouble getting anything at all to stay in my hair: clips, headbands, barrettes, anything. My hair eats it and then spits it out on the ground. Bobby pins, however, have a fighting chance, which is why I've been looking into embellished bobby pins. They're a really simple, easy way to add some bling to your hair style, and imagine how adorable that tiny slice of sparkle would be peeking out from your hair. On another sparkly note, I want this Chanel nail polish. First off, love the name. I'm a total Marie Antoinette nerd. And second, I've had a serious craving for metallic polishes recently. Shimmer is so standard and mattes just don't do it for me, so the next logical step is metallics. Having gold-plated fingernails just seems so summery!




Victoria's Secret Cami & Panty Set, $19.50 at victoriassecret.com, Victoria's Secret Ultrasoft Tank, $22 at victoriassecret.com: Victoria's Secret also has a ton of adorable little camis in super-cute prints. This cami is totally affordable, comes with matching panties, and the colorful leopard print is equal parts fun and super-sassy. This with a pair of cute little shorts or yoga pants = adorable lounging. If you're less into the crazy leopard prints and a little more into the basics, Victoria's Secret also has these asymmetrical hem tanks that I'm seriously craving. The a-line body balances out the tank cut nicely, and these are the kind of top that would go equally well with a pair of shorts or yoga pants or a pain of little jean shorts.

Rose Window Chemise, $58 at anthropologie.com, Victoria's Secret Soft & Lacy Robe, $48 at victoriassecret.com: If your lounging style is a little on the girlier side, I totally recommend this chemise. It's not too sexy or too revealing, could actually double as a daytime dress, and has an adorable, beachy Lolita vibe that's totally endearing. You could sleep in this, roll out of bed and do homework, and still look totally put together. Or if it gets a little chilly, you could throw a chic robe on top. These Victoria's Secret robes come in subdued pastel colors with delicate lace trim--basically the epitome of girliness. I've always wanted a glamorous robe. There's something so Sunset Boulevard about them.


Also, on an unrelated note, the Times Online released their list of the top 25 fashion movies of all time. Here are some highlights: West Side Story, Belle de Jour, the Big Sleep, Atonement, Gone with the Wind, Coco avant Chanel, Funny Face, To Catch a Thief, Zoolander, Devil Wears Prada, and Avatar.
Image Sources:
NARs polish: temptalia.com, Kimora Lee Simmons ad: jezebel.com, Viv & Ingrid bobby pins: vivandingrid.com, Anthropolgie striped cami set: anthropologie.com, J. Crew bikini top: jcrew.com, Anthropologie chemise: anthropologie.com, Victoria's Secret robe: victoriassecret.com, Victoria's Secret cami: victoriassecret.com, Victoria's Secret tank: victoriassecret.com.
But first, this ridiculous fragrance ad from Kimora Lee Simmons. Not only is it blatantly obvious that that is not her body, but apparently the retouchers took her lower half straight off of Daria Werbowy on the cover of Vogue in 2005. Even the shorts are the same. I understand that retouching is pretty much a given in campaign shots, but stealing half of someone else's body? Just weird.
Viv & Ingrid Black Diamond Swarovski Mini Bobby Pair, $36 at vivandingrid.com, Chanel Nail Polish in Versailles: I have trouble getting anything at all to stay in my hair: clips, headbands, barrettes, anything. My hair eats it and then spits it out on the ground. Bobby pins, however, have a fighting chance, which is why I've been looking into embellished bobby pins. They're a really simple, easy way to add some bling to your hair style, and imagine how adorable that tiny slice of sparkle would be peeking out from your hair. On another sparkly note, I want this Chanel nail polish. First off, love the name. I'm a total Marie Antoinette nerd. And second, I've had a serious craving for metallic polishes recently. Shimmer is so standard and mattes just don't do it for me, so the next logical step is metallics. Having gold-plated fingernails just seems so summery!
J. Crew Seersucker Sidney Underwire Top, $50 at jcrew.com, Hint-of-Lace Briefs, $38 at anthropologie.com: So this J. Crew bikini top is in no way related to lounging. I just really want it. I've always wanted an underwire bikini top, just because they're a lot more flattering if you're above a B-cup, and have a serious retro-glam vibe. The seersucker print is so old-school summertime, and coming from someone with a serious lack of preppiness in her closet, I want this preptastic swimsuit. I've realized that Anthropologie has the cutest camis ever. As for the lounging ensembles I promised earlier, my new favorite look is to do a very cute little cami with a pair of more boyish sweats. It's an interesting mix of contrasts, and insanely comfy. The combination of tiny nautical stripes and delicate lace is another offbeat juxtaposition that really works.

Victoria's Secret Cami & Panty Set, $19.50 at victoriassecret.com, Victoria's Secret Ultrasoft Tank, $22 at victoriassecret.com: Victoria's Secret also has a ton of adorable little camis in super-cute prints. This cami is totally affordable, comes with matching panties, and the colorful leopard print is equal parts fun and super-sassy. This with a pair of cute little shorts or yoga pants = adorable lounging. If you're less into the crazy leopard prints and a little more into the basics, Victoria's Secret also has these asymmetrical hem tanks that I'm seriously craving. The a-line body balances out the tank cut nicely, and these are the kind of top that would go equally well with a pair of shorts or yoga pants or a pain of little jean shorts.

Rose Window Chemise, $58 at anthropologie.com, Victoria's Secret Soft & Lacy Robe, $48 at victoriassecret.com: If your lounging style is a little on the girlier side, I totally recommend this chemise. It's not too sexy or too revealing, could actually double as a daytime dress, and has an adorable, beachy Lolita vibe that's totally endearing. You could sleep in this, roll out of bed and do homework, and still look totally put together. Or if it gets a little chilly, you could throw a chic robe on top. These Victoria's Secret robes come in subdued pastel colors with delicate lace trim--basically the epitome of girliness. I've always wanted a glamorous robe. There's something so Sunset Boulevard about them.


Also, on an unrelated note, the Times Online released their list of the top 25 fashion movies of all time. Here are some highlights: West Side Story, Belle de Jour, the Big Sleep, Atonement, Gone with the Wind, Coco avant Chanel, Funny Face, To Catch a Thief, Zoolander, Devil Wears Prada, and Avatar.
Image Sources:
NARs polish: temptalia.com, Kimora Lee Simmons ad: jezebel.com, Viv & Ingrid bobby pins: vivandingrid.com, Anthropolgie striped cami set: anthropologie.com, J. Crew bikini top: jcrew.com, Anthropologie chemise: anthropologie.com, Victoria's Secret robe: victoriassecret.com, Victoria's Secret cami: victoriassecret.com, Victoria's Secret tank: victoriassecret.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






